Home | Bio | Contact |

Federal Witch Hunt Succeeds: Piekarsky And Donchak Convicted Of 'Hate Crime'

Bookmark and Share

Derrick Donchak and Brandon Piekarsky were convicted of what is being called a federal "hate crime" yesterday in Scranton, PA in the beating death of illegal alien Luis Ramirez. They face life imprisonment and are expected to be sentenced in January 2011. The first thing you should know about this federal case though is that the conviction wasn't on a "hate crime" statute, but a statute of the federal Fair Housing Act. Yes, you did read that right. I'll explain that in a bit.

Brandon Piekarsky
Derrick Donchak
Top: Brandon Piekarsky;
Bottom: Derrick Donchak
The witch hunt by the federal government against Piekarsky and Donchak began when they were found not guilty for causing the death of Luis Ramirez in Shenandoah, PA in July 2008. Both were convicted of simple assault in May 2009 and sentenced to at least 6 months in June 2009.

I covered the Shenandoah trial extensively day by day. I found the evidence and testimony at trial in 2009 to be consistent with their convictions and sentencing. You can read the day by day trial coverage, which included a charge of ethnic intimidation - the state version of "hate crime" - at some of the links below.

(Shenandoah Teen Trial Coverage: Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, My Verdict, Verdict is in!, Shenandoah Rally and Archive)

I will not rehash the whole trial here, but I will state that if I believed that these two were guilty of murder I would be the first to point that out, but as you review the trial in the above links I believe you too will come to the same conclusion that I did.

The first trial - Why Donchak and Piekarsky were found not guilty

Here is a basic rundown of the events that occurred and why the teens weren't convicted of murder.

Crystal Dillman Shenandoah Mexican Flag
Crystal Dillman unfurls a Mexican Flag
at a Pro-America Rally in Shenandoah
Six teens who got some booze after a town carnival type event were wandering around town. They came upon 25-year-old illegal alien Luis Ramirez in a park late at night, around 11:30PM, alone with a severely underage girl (13) who just happens to be the younger sister of Crystal Dillman. Dillman, who claims that Ramirez was her fiance and has two children with him and a third from a previous relationship, later received an undisclosed sum from People Magazine for a three page article and $25,000 from a victim's advocate fund. Testimony by Ramirez's friends say that he was drinking prior to going to the park. At the recent federal trial the 13-year-old girl was called Ramirez's "girlfriend" in court.

Brian Scully
Brian Scully
The teens approached him asking them what they were doing there. A fight ensued and slurs were thrown from both sides as it progressed. One teen, Brian Scully, who took a plea deal in the case says he punched Ramirez and knocked him to the ground and said that he was the one yelling "go back to Mexico". Scully says he heard no racial slurs from Piekarsky. Another teen, Colin Walsh, who took a plea agreement and is facing 9 years, with hopes to have his sentenced reduced to 4 for cooperating, claims that he also punched Ramirez. The teens then started to leave. During the fight Ramirez got up and had time to make phone calls to multiple people. He could have walked away. The teens walked away at this point. Scully testified that Ramirez then charged them from behind punched him in the head. A second fight ensued.

Colin Walsh
Colin Walsh
Walsh testified "Walsh: I took Ramirez down with a solid 'uppercut hook' and saw him hit his head". Ramirez hit his head on a curb. Scully claims he tried to kick the unmoving Ramirez in the head but missed then claimed Piekarsky kicked him in the head. Walsh says he doesn't remember Scully trying to kick Ramirez, but claims Piekarsky did, but he made many contradictory statements in his testimony such as shoe colors etc. and stated "Walsh: me, Piekarsky, Donchak and Scully kicked the fallen Ramirez." at one point. No physical evidence was ever introduced. No shoes with blood etc. And as noted all of them had been drinking which brings all of their detailed testimony into question.

The charges of murder arose because Ramirez died two days later due to head trauma. However, at trial Dr. Daniel Brown, a neuropathologist who had examined Ramirez's body on Aug. 1, 2008, testified:

I observed a blood clot between his brain and a protective covering, and blood in an area usually containing spinal fluid. The left side of his brain had extensive contusions and swelling. Because of motion of the brain, an injury to the back of the brain caused an injury to the front. No evidence of trauma to the right side of his brain.

Injuries consistent with a moving head hitting a stationary object.

Note the pathologist says the cause of death was a moving head hitting a stationary object, not a moving object hitting a stationary head. Thus the only physical evidence in the case points away from a kick causing his death.

With all of the testimony, lack of evidence and the testimony of teens who were drunk at the time, it was not a shock to see the two acquitted of murder. Also due to the low threshold of racial slurs, it was also not a shock that they were acquitted of state ethnic intimidation charges. I would just like to point out that if this had been a racially motivated attack, there would have been no lull in the fighting, no time for Ramirez to make multiple cell phone calls and no second attack. The teens would have jumped on Ramirez and beat him to death from the start. Yet they did no such thing. After the initial fight they went to leave and Ramirez attacked them.

The verdicts, evidence and testimony were not good enough for some though.

Illegal Alien Support groups demand a witch hunt - and get it!

Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell
Governor Ed Rendell
As soon as the verdicts and sentencing came down illegal alien support groups in the country which had been rallying in Shenandoah prior to the trial - including MALDEF, La Raza and LULAC - vented their rage and put out their tentacles to their contacts within the federal and state government. They declared that it was a sham trial because it was an all-white jury. One of those tentacles reached Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell who contacted the Federal Department of Justice urging them to prosecute the two. And just a little over 6 months after their sentencing the feds indeed did so. In December 2009 the federal government indicted Donchak and Piekarsky on federal "hate crimes" charges and the witch hunt was on.

As you now know, Piekarsky and Donchak were convicted of those charges yesterday. There is also unsurprisingly no outrage from illegal alien support groups that the jury was all-white for this trial - as that was simply a straw man argument from the start since Shenandoah is a mostly white area. What you would be shocked to hear though is on what charges they were convicted of. As the papers blare that they were indicted of a "hate crime", the true charge has nothing to do with hate, it has to do with preventing illegal alien Luis Ramirez from living where he wants to.

Yes, this charge is under the Federal Fair Housing Act. Here is straight from the Department of Justice's proud press release on the kangaroo conviction of the two - from their civil rights division.

The jury found the defendants guilty of violating the criminal component of the federal Fair Housing Act, which makes it a crime to use a person’s race, national origin or ethnicity as a basis to interfere, with violence or threats of violence, with a person’s right to live where he chooses to live.

There are no Civil Rights for illegal aliens

First, I would just like to point out that recently many have been confusing civil rights with human rights and this is just such a case. Civil rights are those bestowed on a citizen by their country. Immigrants, both legal and illegal, have no civil rights in this country. That is one of the cherished benefits of becoming a citizen. This has been obfuscated by these race pandering groups and attorneys looking for cases and persecutions. They try to confuse you into believing that our system works on human rights and it does no such thing. The UN works on the human rights system. The United States works on a defined civil rights system as outlined in our constitution. A violation of Luis Ramirez's claimed "human rights" has no place in our courtroom. And as he was not a citizen of this country he has no civil rights, so the civil rights division of the Department of Justice is outside of their jurisdiction.

Second, after reviewing the original case above which was a charge of murder and "ethnic intimidation", why is the federal government using some housing clause to prosecute two young men. Piekarsky was only 17 at the time and Donchak was just over 18. How were they depriving Luis Ramirez of where he lived because he got in a fight with them in a park late one night?

Obviously this is the only charge that they could make stick against these two and it should outrage every American that the federal government would go to such length to convict a citizen on unrelated charges just to bow to the whims of the illegal alien lobby. These groups are using the justice system to prosecute people they do not like by trying to make you believe that crimes are segmented between murders that were nice murders and murders that were hateful murders. But going beyond this, no murder even occurred in July 2008, it was an accidental death due to a fight. Yet, these two face life in prison.

Double Jeopardy - Piekarsky and Donchak were tried twice on the same charges

Another item that should should be brought to the reader's attention in this case is the violation of Piekarsky's and Donchak's constitutional rights. As I pointed out in an earlier article on this case, under the fifth amendment of the US Constitution it states quite clearly "[no person shall] be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb". As the two have already faced "ethnic intimidation" charges under the state of Pennsylvania, they should not be allowed to be tried once again for the same incident and the same charges after being acquitted.

The Department of Justice seems to have tip-toed around the fifth amendment by charging them with some Fair Housing Act clause, but as anyone can tell by the headlines in all of the papers, this charge had nothing to do with violating Ramirez's right to live in a house in Shenandoah and everything to do being charged with a "hate crime". As they tout quite clearly it is because they were white and he was Mexican and that is why they were charged and convicted. This is all word play to violate their civil rights under the constitution.

(Update 3:53 PM Oct 15: as an example here is the headline for an AP story "2 men convicted in beating death of Mexican immigrant in Shenandoah" - http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/10/2_men_convicted_in_beating_dea.html - 1) they weren't convicted of beating him to death 2) they weren't convicted of a "hate crime" 3) they were convicted of preventing him from living where he wanted to live. Outrageous lies from the AP)

The fifth amendment was put in place just for such a situation. So that the local, state and federal governments could not charge someone over and over with the same crime in order to eventually get a conviction. It prevented retribution, harassment and corruption. Quite clearly though the illegal alien lobby has managed to get the federal government to take retribution for them and any citizen should take heed at the power of these groups. They are more powerful than you might have imagined and have friends that will back up their goals and efforts even at the federal level to send a message to those opposed to illegal immigration that if you even look at an illegal alien wrong you better watch your back.

Denial of bail why? Are Piekarsky and Donchak a threat?

Piekarsky and Donchak were denied bail and now sit in a federal prison while they await sentencing. This is just one more injustice placed upon them. It is the federal government, with no prior evidence or reason, claiming that these two are such a risk of violating another persons federal Fair Housing Rights that they should be locked up until sentencing. With all that can be found in this one incident, I don't believe I could find one logical or reasoning person who reviews the Donchak/Piekarsky case who would believe that their previous convictions and actions as law abiding citizens would come to the conclusion that they would do such thing again.

Attorneys for Donchak and Piekarsky say they will appeal the conviction. I applaud them for that, but with the current corruption and obvious vendetta-style actions taken by the Department of Justice on behalf of supporters of illegal aliens I seriously doubt they will get a fair appeal trial.

They have an agenda that threatens your rights

A Car Window Calls For The Killing of Brandon Piekarsky and Derrick Donchak
There were never arrests or prosecutions in the threats made against Piekarsky and Donchak's lives

The case of Donchak and Piekarsky is not only a travesty of justice it is a direct warning that our rights are not ours and that they can be violated at will by those in power. You may read other news reports on this case. Many will not delve into the actual case as I have done. None will address the injustices that this case brings forward in regards to violating individual citizen's rights. They will not address how this same type of tactic of Double Jeopardy may one day be used against you because corrupt individuals in this country have an agenda that you are getting in the way of.

Latina Racists Pump Fist
Latina race group pump their fists outside the
Schuylkill County Courthouse at Piekarsky and Donchak
preliminary hearing - August 2008
There is a concerted agenda in the case of illegal alien Luis Ramirez. It was a tailor -made situation for those calling for an amnesty for illegal aliens - but only if they could get a conviction of Piekarsky and Donchak. It didn't take the Pro-Hispanic racist groups long to exploit the situation. In December 2008 they included Luis Ramirez in a filing with the Organization of American States (OAS). The OAS is a group that is trying to claim some jurisdiction over the sovereignty of the United States. They used Luis Ramirez in a filing entitled "Latinos Not Protected In US", as an example of the hate against Latinos in the United States. The ruling in the Piekarsky/Donchak case threatened their claims - and they were none too happy. They had to get a conviction of the two or their agenda could not move forward.

Those in support of illegal aliens will celebrate and simply publicly state that these white boys got what they deserved because obviously they were hardcore racists. They will claim "justice" has been done. Those words coming from their lips are quite simply disgusting. They want their agenda of open borders and unmitigated illegal immigration to continue and those who get in their way should be made an example of. They have no idea of the word justice. They have no idea of the rights of our constitution. They have no respect for the rule of law. And the "Justice" Department has followed them down that hole.

Video of Piekarsky's and Donchak's Attorneys discussing the verdict

This entry is in the following archive(s):

Next and Previous Entries:

Posted by Digger on October 15, 2010 08:40 AM (Permalink)

The Realm Daily Digest
Have Diggers Realm articles emailed to you daily!

Powered by FeedBlitz
See a sample of what a daily email looks like!


This is political persecution by our Federal government much like the case of the two Border Agents. Remember that, in the case of the imprisoned Border Agents, it was Republican President Bush and a new Democratic majority congress that allowed that travesty. So - don't be so sure there will be justice with a Republican sweep in November. There are traitors on both sides of the aisle and those traitors are serving the global elitists via the new "global governance" UN Agenda 21 charter.

Posted by: FreedomFirst on October 15, 2010 04:16 PM

You are correct FreedomFirst. Now take a look back when the BP agent shot and killed that kid who was throwing rocks. The mex gov demanded something be done, and the US is complying (Quietly). Now take another look at the killing by cartels at Falcon Lake. What are WE demanding, and what is being done?

Now take a look back for many years. How many white people have been killed or injured because of the color of their skin? What is being done about that especially when many of them were targets just for being white, and the perps even boasted about it? NOTHING.

Posted by: Nightowl on October 15, 2010 08:08 PM

Seems like they belong in jail to me. They killed a guy on purpose. That's a capital crime.

Posted by: Brenda Koehler on October 16, 2010 12:01 AM

Nobody said they weren't. ReRead the entire article with an open mind, and you will see what we are talking about.

Posted by: Nightowl on October 16, 2010 01:20 AM

They should have dismembered and burned the body. wasn't he the one trying to sleep with an underaged girl? No matter you can't be tried for the same crime, that's more Illegal Alien BS. If he was where he belonged he still be alive. He should stick to chickens like the rest of them.

Posted by: Ed Jones on October 16, 2010 08:26 AM

What it all boils down to is that a person WAS murdered. Regardless of how things may have turned out, it's probably safe to say that no one who participated in the ensuing fights which led to Luis Ramirez' death was up to any good on that fateful night. I, for one, don't buy Piekarsky and Donchak's (and their attorneys) arguments as their attacks on Luis Ramirez were filled and/or charged with malice and intent to hurt or kill.

Posted by: Justo Roteta on October 16, 2010 08:50 AM

Thanks Digger for your articles and exhaustive work in gleaning the facts in the Shenandoah Incident and Trials.
The media has repeatedly distorted facts pertaining to both the incident and trials. The following facts are from COURT TESTIMONY FROM PROSECUTION'S WITNESSES and printed in the Republican Herald: Fact 1: Ramirez was not an innocent victim just walking down the street and attacked because he was Mexican. He was a 25 year old statutory rapist who was supposedly "engaged" to two sisters, one 15 YEARS OLD, whom he had molested since at least 14 years of age. Fact 2: On the night of the incident, one of the defendant youths made a harmless remark to his underage "girlfriend" that it was past her bedtime. It was Ramirez who first started yelling at the defendants and took his shirt off to FIGHT THEM. Fact 3: He was not attacked, knocked out, and fatally injured. He had time to call FOUR of his friends and ask them to bring guns to the scene. Fact 4: Although a minor altercation ensued, it ended when one of his friends appeared at the scene. Fact 5: The defendants were walking away, but RAMIREZ re-started the fight (actually twice) by attacking one of the youths. Fact 6: With his friend also fighting with him, his friend hit one of the defendants, who in turn punched Ramirez, where he fell to the ground and hit his head on the pavement. Fact 7: Regardless if it was the fall to the ground; a subsequent kick to the head by one of the defendants; or hospital error in his death two days later, it is clear that the incident was not racially-ethnically motivated; and he was not intentionally "murdered". (He actually had much to do with causing his own death and wanting to kill the defendants.)

Conclusion: This incident and trial has been so polluted by leftist, social-political agenda and activism to even call in question if the defense in the "Hate Crime" trial had been corrupted by the scandalized DOJ, or if the odd "all-white" jury or pool of potential jurors were contaminated. If defense has truly tried to use the excuse of "alcohol, youth, and testosterone" in defending the youth, especially in light of the established facts from the first trial, then there is a serious question here of corruption or incompetence, and retrial is warranted.

For meticulously, verifiable facts as to what occurred in this incident, Google: “Americans United for True Freedom of Speech” or click here: www.auftfos.wordpress.com.

Posted by: Joe from PA on October 16, 2010 10:02 PM

In Baltimore a few years ago, a black teenager killed a white couple (Jennifer Morelock and Jason Woycio) and proceeded to send his friends a text message saying, "I killed 2 white people around my way 2day & 1 of them was a woman." He was arrested for murder, but a judge released him on a technicality. The Feds have yet to investigate the teen for violating Morelock and Woycio's civil rights. Why do you think that is?

Posted by: A Race Against Time on October 18, 2010 07:53 PM

These kids are murderers plain and simple. How anyone can try and make these animals out to be victims is just sick. I'm against illegal-immigration but it's all the uneducated idiots who support the actions of losers like this that make it possible for all of us who want secured borders look like a bunch of idiot racists.

Posted by: John on October 18, 2010 08:25 PM

Anyone that can defend this murderous illegal alien is sick. This was clearly a case of self-defense. They have every right to speak and joke with the underage White girl. The illegal invader had no right to attack them for it. They're lucky he was killed, otherwise he - or the friends he had called to bring their guns - would have killed one or more of them. There needs to be an investigation into the actions of the federal officials who conducted this witch-hunt.

Posted by: Russ on October 18, 2010 09:40 PM

So our treasonous Justice Dept. put white men in prison for life for DENYING AN ILLEGAL ALIEN THE RIGHT TO LIVE WHEREVER HE WANTS. Bull Sh_t. It's time for States to start seceding from the Union. The Federal govt. is rotten to the core. It is the enemy of white America.

Posted by: Joe G on October 18, 2010 10:54 PM

I have never ever heard of a non-white, being convicted of a hate crime against a white person.

Non-whites rape, assault and murder whites every day, in white countries all over the world and are not convicted of "hate crimes", because whites have no legal protection from hate crimes.

Yes, you heard that right.

White people are fast becoming minorities in our own countries, all over the world and have no legal protection from "hate crimes" anywhere.

This is a dangerous time for white people. We need to wake from our slumber and start asserting our ethnic interests NOW.

Posted by: Dery on October 19, 2010 03:24 AM

Yes, the only answer is to assert White Nationalism. We whites must politically unify, and start thinking of ourselves as a viciously persecuted minority - which we soon will be. Tell that to any honorable Tea Party types. We certainly need fiscal responsibility. But even more we need an end to the non-white IMMIGRATION INVASION. By allowing ourselves to be artificially turned into minorities in our own homelands, we Whites are putting ourselves at imminent risk of property confiscation (already happening), assaults and molestation, enslavement and murder.


Posted by: Leon Haller on October 19, 2010 06:00 AM

It is not enough for everyone to sit on their hands and complain about this injustice. Rendell and any other elected official who collaborated with these illegal alien advocate groups must pay with their jobs.

If this bastard is up for election, then anyone who truly gives a damn will vote his sorry ass out and let him know why as he is packing up his things.

It is only when it becomes common knowledge that treacherous politicians can't even aspire to be the town dog-catcher that this nonsense will stop.

Anyone and everyone who reads this article should pass it on and encourage people to donate to the war chest of any opponent who is running against him.

Anyone living in Pennsylvania needs to get the word out and campaign for his opponent.

Since he concocted this "Fair Housing Act" violation charge, it would be a fitting irony if HE loses HIS housing at the gubnatorial mansion over it.


Posted by: Clytemnestra on October 19, 2010 06:40 AM

This conviction won't survive appeal. It's just TOO stoooopid and too easily argued around.

Posted by: Joe B on October 19, 2010 08:56 AM

Sucks to be those kids. They're puckered up assholes are gonna look like the size of some of the potholes I see on my street.

Posted by: John on October 19, 2010 01:12 PM

@JOHN - I hope an illegal alien drunk driver crashes into and you spend your miserable,worthless life in a wheel chair permanently disabled and disfigured.

Posted by: Wetback on October 19, 2010 04:51 PM

@JOHN - should read "...crashes into YOU and..."

Posted by: Wetback on October 19, 2010 04:55 PM

@ Joe G Yeah I wish the entire south would secede. That whole 3rd world region of our country gives us a bad name. Every country I visited thought America was a sh--hole. And it's because of all the fat racist pricks in the south. It's not my fault all your daughters are f----ng every black thing moving. It's your fault for being from that part of the country where all the women grow up to be fat ugly drunk whores. They most likely learn it from their mothers.

But yeah. I pray every day for secession. So the North can continue to be the class of the west, and the south is free to continue being the a--hole of the region. No longer will you ugly retards hold us back. Hell we'd have to set up the border patrol to kill all the toothless hicks trying to sneak in the North illegally. I wouldn't lose any sleep. You guys are a stain on the white race.

Posted by: John on October 19, 2010 05:20 PM

@Wetback Aw. Thanks. Thats so sweet. I hope that minority you're daughters fucking impregnates her. Lol.

Posted by: John on October 19, 2010 05:22 PM

I believe a crime has been committed against these boys. I believe the perpetrators of this crime should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. I believe that a conspiratorial, traitorous, and villainous crime of this nature is an abomination to the U.S. Constitution and deserving of any punishment short of cruel and unusual punishment as understood at the time of the signing of the U.S. Constitution. I would be proud to do my duty to assist in the defense of the Constitution.

Posted by: Able Baker on October 20, 2010 04:40 PM

BRAVO!! Digger! I think you should send all your info in letter format as a letter to the editor of the Pottsville Republican. But how can we as American citizens help with this particular case? I personally know these two boys and their families and in no way, shape, or form was this a hate crime or murder. Luis took his shirt off and his necklace off...he wanted to fight! He, being the only adult there, should've walked away & had plenty of opportunity to do so! He chose to fight and lost. But on a different subject, how is the federal gov't getting away with charging these boys with violation of the federal fair housing act?? Luis wasn't a citizen, civil laws shouldn't apply! This is definitely a conspiracy brought about by these Mexican groups with the assistance of our own federal government! Please anybody that has any ideas how we can fight this verdict, help these innocent boys & their families, and ultimately protect the United States of America from further harm, please post your ideas. It is our duty as American citizens to help our people.

Posted by: Karen P. on October 20, 2010 08:34 PM

Come on people. Can´t you see what this is all about? It´s just another nail in the coffin of the white man in the US of A. Our rights are being violated and nobody cares. This illegal alien should have been in custody, not chatting up a 13 year girl old in a park at 11.30 at night. The guy´s death was an accident, not a premeditated act of murder. He looked for trouble and got more than he bargained for.
If these kids get railroaded, I´m gonna leave this country. I won´t live in a racist society where people are prosecuted simply because their skin is white.
In the mean time I´m gonna write my congressman and I think you should too. After all, you could be next.

Posted by: John Allcock on October 21, 2010 12:20 PM

Why don´t you try to better yourself man? Your posts are a disgrace and show you have zero respect for yourself, or anyone else for that matter. I´m not sure how they pass moderation, because you are a disgrace to the people of our great country.
If you can´t speak to others who disagree with your opinions in a civil manner, then do us all a favor and keep quiet. At least that way you won´t exibit your lack of class.

Posted by: John Allcock on October 21, 2010 12:32 PM

@John Alcock How am I not being civil? Everything I told these retarded monkey's was fact. Anybody who condones murder on anyone is an idiot. Anybody who thinks people should get away with murder of anyone is an idiot. And the south IS the asshole of the region thats a fact. It's the poorest and stupidest part of our country.

And anyone who thinks it's harder for the white man in this country is an idiot. My life is better than anybody I've ever met in this country of another race. Then again most people that are filled with racism are rural uneducated inbred hicks so I shouldn't be surprised. If you're STUPID then yeah life will be harder for you. Hell buddies of all the conservatives are shipping educated jobs to India, Brazil, and Mexico so uneducated scum like you have no chance. No wonder you guys are so mad.

I'm AGAINST illegal immigration by the way. But all you racists condoning violence make the anti-illegal crowd look bad. Not only that but you're condoning violence on the wrong sort of people. If you were actually just anti-illegal immigration and not just an idiot racist you'd know the sole blame is on all the employers who hire the illegals. If they would raise wages and improve the working conditions then fat ugly unemployed trash like yourself could do those jobs instead. If there's no work then there's no more illegals flooding the country. But you guys go ahead and keep believing the right-wing lip service. Cause thats all it is. They have no intention of ending illegal immigration. But they still have you retards under complete control. (Then again it doesn't take much effort to control a retard)

Posted by: John on October 26, 2010 06:59 PM

John, can you tell us why you think white people shouldn't be allowed to have their OWN countries any more?

Just think, there would be no more 'racism', because all the 'racist' whites would obviously choose to live in the ALL WHITE countries, and only the 1% or so of whites who are actually insane enough to want to be surrounded by third worlders would be living with them, hence NO MORE RACISM.

Do you have any comments, John? (It would probably help you if you had actually thought any of this through in the first place...)

Posted by: Dr Adford on November 4, 2010 08:22 AM

What can we do to help these two young men? I'll contact the ACLJ but what other organizations have the capability of standing up against the Federal Government? We need a Constitutional Law lawyer or group to act as advocates.

Posted by: beverly sydlosky` on November 8, 2010 09:37 PM

Coming from a POLICE OFFICER...the two kids and the corrupt officers got what they deserved. The fact that the guy was here illegally was irrelevant. The jury in PA was obviously unable to convict these idiots because of their own racial prejudices (and a terrible public prosecutor). Civil rights apply to everyone regardless of race, sexual orientation, age, etc…In the US you can assume that Civil Rights apply to everyone. Double jeopardy only applies if you are charged for the same crime; obviously the state statute was very different than the federal statute. You do the crime, you do the time. Stop trying to blame law enforcement (Government) for enforcing the laws and place the blame on the two criminals that committed the crimes. You are crazy to think that we should be standing up to the government for two people that killed a man and not standing up for a dead man that was killed by two people. A man’s life was taken and you are treating the criminals with more respect than the victim. Put your passion to work in another area.

Posted by: Joe on January 27, 2011 07:03 PM

I seriously don't think these kids killed intentionally,clearly it was an accidental death, the state should have charged them with involentary homicide.And the Federal Gov.should focose more on deportation of illeagls.Problem solved.If any thing our Gov.supports raceisum & predjudice,they certainly don't invite unity!

Posted by: John on February 11, 2011 10:15 PM

Also see these other great immigration resources

The Dark Side Of Illegal Immigration
The Dark Side Of Illegal Immigration

A 28 part detailed report on the negative impacts of illegal immigration.
Immigration Stance
Immigration Stance

Find out how your members of Congress voted on immigration issues.

The Dark Side Of Illegal Immigration
Read the free 28 part report The Dark Side of
Illegal Immigration

Includes facts, figures
and statistics.

  ... More Categories

Site Meter

Search Diggers Realm
Web Diggers Realm

The Realm Daily Digest
Have Diggers Realm articles emailed to you daily!

Powered by FeedBlitz
See a sample of the email!

ICE Tip Line

Capitol Switchboard

Your Representatives
On Immigration
Find out how your members of Congress voted on immigration issues at Immigration Stance.

Get The Latest Immigration News
Illegal Immigration News
The latest all in one place! Bookmark it today!

Knights Of The Realm

Home | Bio | Contact | Sitemap

Copyright © Dan Amato - 1996-Present