/ October 21, 2008 03:57 PM
I don't know if you've seen this Obama speech where he lost his teleprompter, but watch it below. Obviously this "man who cares" did not even take the time to read the story of the one he is presenting in the speech. He knows nothing as once the teleprompter goes out he cannot even recall the basic details of what he is presenting.
This is horrible. He is a robot that cannot operate without the program that is obviously written in full by others. In a most audacious act in the second portion of the first video he tries to blame his idiocy on the audience as if they are the cause for his inability to present his arguments, just as he will do if he is elected president.
Obama supporters will be quick to defend him, but really, if this doesn't show you that the man knows nothing and is simply reading off a card in an eloquent manner then I don't know what will.
In the second video below Obama responds to a question from the audience and sounds like a blubbering fool. And the same people that will defend him have made comments about Bush's speaking style for years. Not that I'm defending Bush, that sellout piece of crap that spends worse than a drunken sailor!!
This entry is in the following archive(s):
Next and Previous Entries:
Posted by Digger on October 21, 2008 03:57 PM (Permalink)
If that Baby-Killing Leftist, gets in to office, America deserves him. Germans knew what Hitler was before he was elected, but made excuses. God help this country. "A country can be judged, by how it treats the children, of that country". Mother Teresa
Posted by: Jack D. Ripper on October 22, 2008 09:26 AM
Both McCain AND Obama simply suck. They both got SOME decently good goals to help out the country and its people, but they also got some major problems and flaws within their beliefs and plans, and supporting the bailout bill was the worst of it so far. If Obama gets into office, he'd lose his buddy, the teleprompter. If McCain gets into office, Hello Bush number II.
And Jack, Not to start a debate on pro-life, I can't help responding to you, but let me ask you a question here. If a woman gets raped and pregnant, do they HAVE to keep that baby? Rape isn't natural sex. If call abortion a crime, why don't you put rape on the top of that first. When that (even though it won't) goes away, then we can worry about abortion. As for your quote by Mother Teresa, add to the fact that women are also part of the children of that country.
Posted by: K. Loss on October 22, 2008 12:07 PM
This reminds me of the classic Robert Redford movie, The Candidate. They picked a 'pretty face' to run for office, a puppet. When he actually got elected he looked at his handlers in the hotel room and asked, I believe, "What do I do know?..." with a scared look in his eye.
Posted by: fedupinwaukegan on October 23, 2008 08:21 AM
K. LOSS "Rape, Incest, a One Nighter, a child is a child. Look for a reason to kill the unborn, and you will find one. "KEEP", your standards on allowing a child to live are to be commended, for a NAZI!. Any life is "God's Gift"! And as for my "Quote" I will add nothing , it is a "Quote" you Moron!
Posted by: Jack D. Ripper on October 23, 2008 08:42 AM
Technology or science fiction. The great crash of 2008 it seems was bound to happen. If Isaac Asimov and Arthur C Clarke are right the world now has to look for a new technology to save itself from this crisis. There are two options available to it – one short term and the other long term. And the legal systems present in the western world allow them to use both these options without any moral or legal pin pricks.
It was Clarke who predicted the mobile phone and satellite TV and they both came true, the world will one day be one gossiping community and it happened then came Asimov and he formulated the three laws of robotics. He dreamt of a world where one day humans would be free to enjoy the resources of the world at leisure and the work force would comprise only robots. Mechanical intelligent, human looking but not greedy for resources. They would need no water, no sewage, no hospitals and no taxis. On the other hand they would run services, police the area, carry out hazardous tasks, in short do everything that does not involve creativity.
The most complicated surgeries would be performed by robots, robot chauffeurs would ferry humans around, nannies would take care of babies and butlers would attend to their masters needs. Everything that coloured people are asked to do today in a rich white man’s world today or in Europe and America, be it the Indian techie or the Latina housemaid.
In short this is the first short term option to keep an economy going if it is modelled on the western pattern of growth. Get Asian robots to work for you and live as an exclusive community. It does not work for long as the barriers both social and economic begin to dissolve as new generations and young people with raging hormones do not necessarily respect the barriers created by their elders. But this unfortunately is the short term option available to the Obamas of this world. Create jobs, save the economy and bring in the robots from Asia. So Asia will boom in a time when their population is expanding and their economy needs the services to fund its growth on the western model.
Then comes the second long term option, create a technology that does away with human labour so that you don’t have to deplete resources. In short the Positronic brain as conceived by Asimov. This brain would be a processor to run robots the way a processor runs a computer.
A technology becomes viable when another becomes too expensive to maintain. Why did the British leave India? The empire was too expensive to maintain. Why did the Yanks abolish slavery and phase out the steam driven machine of the factories of the south. Again a matter of economics. Today the mobile phone is cheaper than a land line again economics, just imagine putting up miles of cable for a land lines to connect remote villages in India especially in the North East and Thar Desert. Mobile technology is far cheaper. So the time is right for Asimov’s robots too. Which prompts a question? Is Obama a robot come to save America?
In a world where the human population is shrinking and pollution and generation of wealth go hand in hand, it is only a matter of time before the white world will be forced to take decisions that may end the services boom for Asians in Europe and America forever.
Posted by: anuradha chak on November 23, 2008 01:39 AM
"if this doesn't show you that the man knows nothing and is simply reading off a card in an eloquent manner then I don't know what will."
I don't particularly care for Obama, but this issue seems completely superficial to me. If you were giving a speech and the teleprompter went out, you'd probably also have an awkward moment.
That said, I think we should treat him like a robot.
Posted by: Clint on July 14, 2009 11:33 AM
You are a pathetic B.S.er. The first video shows him being interrupted, causing him to pause and try to continue, only to be interrupted several times again. The second is obviously edited to make it seem like he is babbling. Just look at the guy up in the back and how he keeps abruptly moving to new locations. Is this the best you can do? Loser!
Posted by: John on September 28, 2009 09:31 AM
I don't have any reasons to put Obama down. This is just a misunderstanding. He is always a prompt and dedicated person especially in public service. If there are cases as such, he is just human and not a perfect person. He doesn't have to panic. He still have his composure.
Posted by: Candy on August 17, 2011 11:07 AM